🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.